OK, thanks.

I just checked the MS site (for the runtime files), and Windows 98 is listed, but Windows 95 not (obviously, since it is no longer officially supported).

No hardware requirements are listed; I have the impression that the runtime files are considered an extension of the OS.

>Hilmar,
>
>Well, another thing to keep in mind is 'requirements' versus 'optimal requirements'. A .NET app may run in 128, but I always encourage users to try to get as close to 'optimal' as possible. Especially when users may be running Outlook/Groupwise, Excel, etc. (Since most users have those apps open at the same time).
>
>Time is money these days - if someone is losing 5-10 minutes a day because of a slow machine, that approaches 2 hours a month. Depending on someone's salary, a memory upgrade (assuming the machine CAN be physically upgraded) pays for itself in a fairly short period of time.
>
>There are always other factors. A machine may have a great processor, but often I'd still opt for more memory. And if it's a thick-client or smart-client app, a slow drive (or slow transfer rate) can really affect performance as well.
>
>Kevin