>No offense inteded. I agree with Kevin on this. It's the interpretation. And he's right...people go from not understanding to understanding. And you don't go instantly from one to the other. There are an infinite number of points between the two. I can't judge where you are on that line...and even if you're all the way over to not understanding, it does not make you or anyone else stupid...it just means that you're closer to not understanding than understanding.

I am not willing to discuss here a interpretation of MS marketing strategy (like Kevin is starting with me), there are just too many gray areas to allow for too many different opinions, or how far some people are in their learning curve in understanding what goes on around them.

i don't know you personally, or anyone else here at UT, other from the messages i read here on a daily bases. all i am saying is that i think you could have chosen you words differently. to presume that anyone who reads that message has a lesser understanding is not a very diplomatic way.

where i do agree with you that one has to always learn about 'reading' the facts, some more, some less, i happened to think that i do have a good understanding (as far as its possible), however, we are always learning.

if i agree with you in the subject of the letter or not, has no baring on my original statement, which simply was ment as a awarness to the words you had chosen.