Would it have been any different if I had said "I think that MVPs aren't signing it because MAYBE we understand the issue better". Like it or not, even with editing, things get missed... All I am saying is what I just said is what was meant in my other post. If you read it differently, you read it differently.

>in my original post:

>...
>> I think that MVPs aren't signing it because we understand the issue better. We
> understand the effect the letter will have. We understand that MS already knows the
>issues.
>...
>
>Now that was NOT a very nice or/and smart statement!

>i do not engage in the discussion about anything but his statment that the MVP's have
> a better understanding then others - thats all. where do you see me giving my
>oppinion about MS strategy?
>
>I do not discuss the subject on any of MS decissions/behaviours because that will always be a sensless conversation - there are just too many things we do not know. therefor anything said in that respect would be a guess and/or an opinion - unless someone here knows about some MS internal (probably classified) desissions.
>