Hi, Walter.

>>>1. The issue was BUG FIXES and not "upgrades". We're all happy to pay for upgrades of significance. BUGS are another matter and it is my opinion that anyone who dismisses them as minor/irrelevant does us ALL a disservice. It is immaterial that the VFP Team is small and possibly in jeopardy.
>
>>What critical bugs are still in VFP 8 that justify another Service Pack from your point of view?
>
>Ohh, I can assure you there are many. The grid for example is one that is stuffed with bugs and SP1 made it even worse (Afterrowcol change does not fire when a refresh in beofrerowcolchange). Haven't you seen the number of bugs FabioL has posted here. OK not are critical, but sure there are some that are quite annoying.
>
>I guess it depends on your definition of critical. When I can hardly workarround the bugs (as is the case with grids), it would justify a SP IMO

Well, that's my point. What's "quite annoying" for you hasn't been a problem for me in all this time. Indeed, I don't have any critical issues regarding grids. Enhancement requests, many. Critical bugs, not a single one. but I'm speaking of myself (and my company).

So, the important thing is a Service Pack should be released when an important number of critical (in a broad sense) bugs are found. I think VFP 8 is stable enough. You may know that any additional release can introduce newer issues, so in this case, I'd prefer thatno further SPs, and instead concentrating development efforts in enhancements (and of course, little bug fixes) for a higher version.

This was my point from the start.

Regards,