Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
It's here!!! VFP9 Beta download is ready!
Message
De
04/06/2004 21:09:57
 
 
À
04/06/2004 17:58:09
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Visual FoxPro Beta
Divers
Thread ID:
00909693
Message ID:
00910257
Vues:
27
Al (and Jim),

For how VFP does it now, have a read of MSKB #281281.

For operation (generally) of cacheing/buffering in Windows, the following may be helpful: Data, cache, networked I/O, FLUSH processing factors Thread #749598 Message #749598

I think you're delving too deeply, worrying about things that you needn't. I think it's fair to assume that anyone using the API for this stuff will have the API itself ensure that factors like you are mentioning are being covered. Especially given how the MS MSDN info is roughly descriptive but certainly not definitive.

And, indeed, I am delighted (assuming no gotcha's) < s >

cheers

>>I was serious :-) Really. Knowing Jim's extensive research on the subject, I thought he'd be delighted. Makes one wonder why it was done any differently in the past...
>>
>>Let us know how the testing goes. The MSDN library isn't very revealing on the matter.
>
>The help says FLUSH now calls the FlushFileBuffers API function... like you say, if it wasn't doing this before, exactly what WAS it doing?
>
>If by MSDN Library you're referring to http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/base/flushfilebuffers.asp then yeah, it's not too enlightening.
>
>I think ultimately it has to depend on the device driver for the disk subsystem in question, and if/how well it implements FFB. The driver would absolutely have to respect FFB if called with a volume option because that's what must get called on a system shutdown. Would it respect FFB called with a single file or group of files as argument(s)? (a group of files might be treated in VFP as multiple single-file calls).
>
>I'd like to think if it respects the former, it *should* respect the latter. But, in a commodity market OEMs might be trying to differentiate themselves from the competition on benchmarks. It's possible they could show higher numbers if they ignored single-file FFB calls and simply left it up to a lazy-write algorithm to take care of it "whenever".
>
>To a certain extent nVidia and ATI have been engaging in dodgy optimizations to make their video cards look better in the fiercely competitive graphics world.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform