That goes against the teachings of my Jedi Master, Obe One Kenobe!:-) Thanks for the post - I'll cjeck it out!


>Never rely on your feelings, use the profiler or at least do some tests to compare the two.
>
>>My feelings are similar: That SEEK is faster. I noticed the difference in lag times in DOS (CDX/MDX) xbase platforms when 386's reigned king.
>>Thanks
>>
>>
>>>Hi Terry,
>>>
>>>I know that strange but seek is faster than go to. I read an article about that years ago and tested.
>>>
>>>Maybe go to command force to a real physical record move and seek don't do it until data read (I know indexseek don't say it :), but maybe it do same indexseek until read record ).