Hi Walter,

well said, and exactly what most of us VFP programmers feel.

>I fail to find the writings nor I´m able to read them. Can you show it to me ?
>The problem is that the writings are only exising in your perception of the future of VFP. It by no means tells you to spread the world to people who see very different writings.
>
>For example. The writing I might see is, VFP is going to phase out somewhere in the future, but not before .NET has dramatically changed beyond recognition (Longhorn, Avalon) as has far better support for data driven designs than the crappy current implementation. So meanwhile VFP developers who can support themselves right now, are better off untill there is a real better alternative to VFP for the things they are doing. And please don´t take anything for granted from the so called experts because they´re only trying to justify they are making the best choice rather than beeing totally objective and able to judge your needs. So rather than to act blindly like a sheep, evaluate your own situation.
>
>
>Walter,