Thanks thomas,

It explains. I´m not sure though if it fits the bill though.

Walter,

>
>The following is only an opinion and I hope you sense the attempt at humor. I am speaking in the first person. Apologies to Fabio for only he knows what he truly meant.
>
>Perhaps it can be stated in political terms? I am interpreting what I have read in these threads and therefore have been prejudiced. Only John, Walter and a team of lawyers can decide what is really the point of all this. Even then a judge will have to make a decision as to the true meaning of what has been stated.
>
>John’s position (as he sees himself) on .NET is that of a “Moderate” – in the center of a political example. John sees VFP as a left or liberal position not to be embraced. Before the fall of the Soviet Union, left meant communist. Amazing how the connotation of terms changes.
>
>Walter sees VFP from a right wing perspective – that is from a conservative position. Another term associated with a political position on the right is “fascist”.
>
>Now if you use dot net you are a moderate. Otherwise you are on the left or right wing. The reality is that everyone sees himself or herself in a different light. That should help confuse the issue! :)
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>>Sorry Fabio, I fail to understand what you´re trying to say here
>>
>>Walter,
>>
>>
>>>Whichever process more variable independent has one distribution Gaussian statistics.
>>>
>>>With logic of John, NET it is in the center and VFP is on the part of left,
>>>for you VFP is on the right part.
>>>It changes the perspective.
>>>
>>>It can be?