Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
Information générale
Catégorie:
Conférences & événements
>
Generally speaking when writing a networked database application, the DBFs are stored on a network drive, suspectible to network failure, (index) curruption, performance issue, etc. With local cursors you don´t have that problem at all, because they´re local.
>
>- Cursors don´t suffer from corruption.
>- Cursors are always local
>- Cursors generally reside in memory
>- Cursors at most live durring the run of the application
>- Cursors are not listed in the database cataloge (database container)
>
>That pretty muchs rules out about all disadvantages you have when dealing with DBFs.
>
You still have a 2g limit...... Putting all of the insignificant things you list aside - from an interaction standpoint - you know.....the stuff that matters....cursors and dbf's - in all material respects are the same.
John
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement