Thanks to you!!, with your support, VFP 9.0 will be a great product (at least, less strange "B"s)
You are a great tester, just like GarretF post at his blog:

http://blog.donnael.com/2004/06/hallmarks-of-great-tester.html



>Thanks to the VFPT in order not to have rendered all the my job completely useless in order to improve Visual FoxPro.
I think can be useful to bring back a list of the problems that me seem resolved.

>Fixed on VFP9.1720:

>Thread #850645
>Thread #869906
>Thread #887816
>Thread #885697
>Thread #835102
>Thread #906434
>Thread #901192
>Thread #897949
>Thread #893984
>Thread #892851
>Thread #890361
>Thread #898430 with FOXOBJECT CLAUSE
>Thread #858634 this fixed have insert bug
>Thread #849781
>Thread #824767
>Thread #804126
>Thread #801179
>Thread #793521 with new CAST() function
>Thread #793392 CAST
>Thread #789923
>thread #826364
>Thread #872415
>Thread #826732
>Message #887077
>Thread #787850
>Thread #826735
>Thread #826736
>Thread #802831
>Thread #827451
>Thread #783170 attention to this ! ( see SQL – Optimize TOP N Performance )

>Fixed on VFP9.1XXX:

>Thread #900095 confirmed
>Thread #824792 not confirmed


>Of course those remained opened, are still numerous,
but me it seems to have noticed that if is reproduced well,
the Team (with the human resources that it has to disposition) tries to resolve them.

>Of course, it remains the fact that for sure errors can be necessary much time in order to write the minimal code that reproduces it well.

>Ill-fatedly the greater part is problems legacies to modalities
of miscalculation or not standard,
and for these road is not difficult to find one alternative.

>Where it is often difficult or impossible to find an alternative is when the errors are taken place in the events of the objects.
Here me seems that we are still far from a satisfactory level.

>Fabio