>hello,
>thank you very very much,
>it works very well.
>i want to ask, you used For i think we need Endfor,
>but it works, this is like vb.
> any way thanks again.
>regards.

for ...
  ...
endfor

and

for ...
  ...
next

are equivalent.

From the help:

FOR Var = nInitialValue TO nFinalValue [STEP nIncrement] 
  Commands
  [EXIT]
  [LOOP]
ENDFOR | NEXT

In a syntax summary such as this one, the vertical line, ENDFOR | NEXT, means that you have to use one of the two. (By the way, the symbols around EXIT, LOOP and STEP mean that those parts of the command are optional.)

Both NEXT and ENDFOR are valid. If you only use VFP, ENDFOR is more logical, since other control structures have comparable endings (do...enddo, scan...endscan, etc.) NEXT is more familiar to people who are accustomed to some other programming languages (especially BASIC, I think).

I didn't do much work in BASIC, but somehow I got accustomed to using ENDFOR instead of NEXT.