>---
>Huh? There's no Dutch equivalent expression and I don't understand your point. Aren't we all setting up our arguments in a way that we want to set it up? Why don't you simply come with your agreements or counter arguments?
>----
>
>Yes we are all doing *that*. And I did come up with arguments that suited the discussion, I think.
>
>But we are not "all" interpreting somebody else's statement and then answering the statement as we have rephrased and restated it. That is what *you* did, here <s>:

Lisa, my rephrasing was indeed an attempt to show you how I interpreted your words. Sorry, I guess I misunderstood your words. A point I'd like to make here is that it's quite often somewhat difficult for me to interpret *your* words.

>>---
>For example, you write about a 'tremendous amount of effort' that was required to (my words/interpretation) replace the old preview routine.
>>---
>
>It is *my* opinion (and I am entitled too <s>) that if somebody tells me I said something I didn't say, and then proceeds to tell me why it isn't so, I don't have to counter the argument.

This is an example. I really have to read that last sentence over and over again and can only hope that finally I made the only intended interpretation. Oh well, forget it... :)


>---
>I cannot locate the spot where the percentage is actually used to resize the page(s).
>---
>
>That's because you don't have to worry about it <s>. All you have to do is resize the canvas (container or shape), using any formula you want. Then you pass a reference to the canvas to the Engine and it renders on the surface you have indicated.
>
>Please spend some more time with the release notes and then ask any further questions you have. We will do our best to help.

I'll do that. Thanks for the tip.