>Peter,
>
>FWIW, I still use maybe 20 UDFs in my development. I don't think making them a method of some object makes them any more accessible, in fact it tends to hinder their use because you have to instantiate the ProcedureObject. I also don't use a monolithic procedure library. Each udf lives in it's own file, the filename matches the UDF name so you never have to SET PROC anywhere, you can just use them like builtin VFP functions.


Thanks for the input, David.

Is there any kind of speed penalty for keeping each UDF in a separate file?

(I may have subconscious fears of this approach becuase of dBase II and III where the access time to a separate file was attrocious! :)

Peter