David,

I really don't care how and where the bugs are reported, as longs as they are easily accessible and there is a possibility for discussion. The UT seems to be the best choice, but if someone knows something better, I'm open to any better suggestion.

Walter,





>Walter,
>
>You want everyone to have easy access, and bug threads here do not provide that because to be able to search you must pay. So that cuts out a significant part of the people that come here seeking/giving help from/to the community.
>
>I'm just bringing up the point the relative strength does not matter. (It's been discussed ad-nauseum here too about how not everyone in the world can afford the PUTM fees so I'm not wanting to add a whole new subthread on that topic either.) To make it onto the bug list here does in fact involve more time so nothing comes for free.
>
>>Since when is "common man" <> "PUTM" ? I've been a PUTM for a long time so I cannot comment on what you can do and can't do withouth it, but before I became one, it was possible to search, but it was impossible to click the link. Then you have to search for that message via the calendar.
>>
>>Anyways, not a very strong argument IMO. Any serious VFP developer has the choice to become a PUTM for a reasonable price a year. I can also imagine that bugs are listed in a seperate section like the wishlist, that would be accesible for everyone.