>>
>>If I understand your requirement I would use one table with a many to many relationship.
>>
>>Tom
>
>Are you a mind reader?
>
>Just kidding. You're answer might be correct. :)
Just call me "almost Karnac the Great" Sorry Johnny Carson. :)
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only