>>> No server software or hardware. For my data uses, I think VFP's the best.
>
>So what you are doing is super-imposing your specific trivial requirements as a general rule. No difficulty in finding the logic flaw there....
When deciding on the best software for my data uses the consideration of my data uses is hardly a trivial requirement!
You're silly.
I've been pretty explicit that its not a general rule, and that "the best" anything lies only with subjective selection criteria. This is in contrast to you, who passes counter arguments off as a general rule.
You're a hypocrite.
>>The way you argue your points and nitpick others makes you the Michael Moore of the UT, you know.
>
>Usually, people that cannot make/defend a point will say what you say.
My point with this was that you are the typical internet troll. Something that has been done by others for a long time and something that has been done far better than you're doing it.
Something I've learned over the years is that *any* point of view may be defended or dismissed given the right amount of nitpicking, and all that it requires is some knowledge and a fair amount of stubborness.
On the other hand, if you choose to accomplish something more than the masturbatory pleasure of winning a contest in your own mind only, then you'll need engage in dialog with both wisdom and humility.
You, troll, are a child with a tool who knows its power but not its responsibility.
You're a fool.
>This reminds me of when you tried the whole "I can write a more scaleable app in Fox/DBF's than you can in SQL Server"....
>
>Now THAT was lol...
Please cite the message that contains that quote.
You're a psued.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only