>
Exactly how many full-life-cycle apps have you designed and developed where security was more of a priority than usability?
>

Security was, in at least 1 situation, as much a priorty as usuability given that HIPAA was applicable. That said, security is an issue that is - more often than not - a real concern and a requirement. And, it goes without saying that Fox cannot address that need. The fact that usability MAY be more important is 100% irrelevant to the issue.



>Maybe he's saying if one sucks in VFP, then perhaps - one may suck [antithetically] in .NET.
>

Perhaps... Given that what you recite is flawed logic, I have no doubts that what he meant...

>
A somepoint JB, some of us need to admit, at least to ourselves, that our careers in VFP development was a failure. Let it go - quit blaming it on VFP, get on with your life - you didn't earn them nasal tatoos for naught!
>

Careers in Fox, at least from my standpoint, was a success. Blindly staying with the tool in the face of reality - now that is a failure.

One need not go any further than the ex-leaders of the Fox community that are no longer around - that have moved on. The most successful people remaining in Fox will not come close to achieving the success these people will achieve.

The fact is Terry, one will be limited when a tool's innovation is measured by the new and exiting ways you can rotate a label....