>
Since when does your distaste for RVs justify an announcement that only po-dunk work is done in VFP or that its data access is like a pig or a whore? (sic)
>

I think I said RV's were like putting earings on a pig. i.e., it was just an accessory - with little to no added value.

Get it right JR....

>
Even if your summary dismissal of RVs has valid grounds, not all VFP work involves RVs, and RVs are not the only way to access data using VFP- indeed I believe you recently did some great non-po-dunk work using VFP against Oracle, did you not?
>
>
Are you retracting those earlier statements? If so, it is appreciated and we can leave it there.
>

No....but you are spending WAY too much time taking things personally...