>No...DBF's vs SQL Server...clear distinction....
>
>Ah. So when you say "Fox cannot meet that security need" you actually mean "local tables/files cannot meet that security need".
>
>Fox, of course, can.

At an application level...sort of... at a db level....no. From an app stand point, Fox cannot come close to the security architecture present in .NET...

Sure..you could probably cobble together a solution...but given that the state of the art has progressed a bit since 1995 - it would pale in comparision to what other environments could faciliate.