>John,
>
>>Sure, VFP has native data - but tht is not an advantage of VFP - that is just a difference. The fact is, whatever you can do with VFP+DBF's - the same can be done in .NET+SQL Server.
>
>
Sure you keep on avoiding to make a VFP/SQL Server with .NET/SQL Server comparision.
>

VB/SQL Server is superior to VFP - if for no other reason because VB was/is a better consumer of ADO/OLE-DB than Fox.


>
Your reasoning and arguments are seriously flawed. I'd begin to think you don't know what you're talking about.
>

Considering I probabaly have more VFP/SQL Server apps and VFP/Oracle Apps under my belt than 99% of the VFP developers out there - AND - given that I was on the team that built what is arguably one of the biggest VFP apps in the world - and in turn - one of the larger SQL Server apps in the world - you would be quite wrong in this assertion on your part.

In this area, you don't want to start comparing CV's.....