Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Future as a FoxPro Developer
Message
 
À
01/07/2004 13:29:19
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00918302
Message ID:
00919752
Vues:
37
>
You can with code just as easy as you can do in .NET with code. With visual classes it requires a USE and a REPLACE command, that's all.
>

in .NET, I simply shift to code view, change one line of code, and then go back to the gui view. There is no comparision between that and VFP...



>>Not beeing an expert, but what if you want to inherit complex forms? As I was told there is no way of visual inheritance. If you've got a complex form, you've got to define it in code, Yuck...
>
>>Thats bunk...you have visual inheritance in .NET...
>
>Prove it.... AFAIK, you cannot define a form class visually and subclass it visually just like in VFP.
>

Just like VFP? Of course not....NET is far better. .NET does not have the archaic VCX meta-data structures to deal with - its all code.

Incredible...You lay out the premise that you can't do visual inheritance in .NET. I say you can - and explain how. Then you say prove it - and then go on to qualify your challenge by saying it can't be done in the same way it is done in Fox.

Walter, that is your major problem...all of your knowledge - such as it is - is 100% wrapped up into how the task is accomplished in VFP. As a result, without VFP, you are a person stranded on an island without a life raft. VFP is your life-raft. And to your detriment, instead of having the skill to fashion your own life raft, you are stranded becuase you are dependant on the VFP life raft being there. In a nutshell, you are trapped into a way of thinking that will paralyze - no scratch that - HAS paralyzed your ability to think outside the Fox Box.


Oh well...you only have yourself to blame Walter...


>
Maybe you should provide prove. From all that I hear, this is the case, only having your argument that its not. Given the history of your lies, you better prove it.
>

From a guy who is parroting what he has HEARD - you are telling me to offer proof? Sorry Walter, but you are the one making the assertions - and therefore, the burden of proof rests with you.

Lies???? From me???? I don't think so Walter...
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform