Hi Lisa,

The utility code is exactly as at the url you mention.

/Torgny


>Thank you for confirming so quickly <s>.
>
>Yes, the group footer and summary problems are known and have been fixed. The shaded box behavior has been changed since your build but is probably never going to be perfect (there's a way of representing the fill patterns in the html but not a real "fill pattern" as such, without using non-standard HTML extensions).
>
>As far as your PRG utility goes... Outlook blocked it as code, you'd have to zip it for me to get it.
>
>IAC if it is based (for example) on
>
>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:80/support/kb/articles/Q257/6/24.ASP&NoWebContent=1
>
>(How To Clear Report TAG, TAG2, and EXPR Fields Using .pjx Hooks)
>
>... you don't have to send it, there may be nothing wrong with the utility per se. Since you are doing this during a compile process, however, it's possible that *one* failed compile at some point put this junk into the FRXs and it just stayed there, harmless until now <s>.
>
>As for the DE code ... that's fine. I mean, the code is fine and the XMLListener behavior here is as expected. When I asked about this before, I forgot that XMLListener limits the amount of code it dumps into that node to a representative sample, that's why yours got truncated as shown.
>
>Thanks again for working this through,
>
>>L<