>>
>ROFLMAO, Again you don't dare to say VFP/SQL again huh? Your arguments are pathetic. ADO has even worse local data processing capabilities than ADO.NET and is total crap. So VFP8 has a terrible support of OLE DB ? Hmmm, who wrote those articles on MSDN using ADO in VFP? You really don't know what you're talking about huh?

>I said VB was a BETTER Consumer of ADO/OLE-DB than VFP. That is not the same as saying VFP has terrible support.

No you did not. You did say VB/SQL was superiour to VFP! Don´t twist the argument.

>John, it is no use. Your arguments stink, and we all on the UT know it. You're a Jerk and a VB / .NET Weenie.

>Well well well...so this is what it comes to...One one hand, you say my arguments "stink" - and then you resort to this.

Well, you use this tactic all the time, and now crying if it is against you. Grow up.

>I feel sorry for you. Your only reason to be here is to justify from what you've been laughed about. No wonder you took a lawyer carreer. You don't have the intention to be constructive and your sole reason is debunk VFP where you can. People are sick of you and everywhere you go you're puged out. You've been banned from litterly every VFP site for your childish behaviour. Some people don't grow up.

>I better grow up??? You better look in the mirror Walter.

You broke all the mirror john....

>More lies...I worked on it with Rod Paddock and Jim Duffy... How much money do you want to put on the table Walter????

I don´t see how this has anything to do with this, john. Again you´re twisting the argument. Size of a database application has nothing to do with complexity and has nothing to do with the size of a database SYSTEM (See definition of CJ Date).

You can´t fool me john. You´re a bully and your sole reason to be here is to bash VFP and raise your ego. You do not have any intentions to be a constructive member of this community. Therefore you´re the cancer of the UT.

Beyeyeye,

Walter,