>>>>Prove it.... AFAIK, you cannot define a form class visually and subclass it visually just like in VFP.
>
>>http://www.code-magazine.com/article.aspx?quickid=0102021&page=1
>
>Thanks for that claudio,
>I then still wonder though what the difference is between the inheritance in .NET and VFP, because there apparently is a big difference.
>

You "wonder" what the differences are? There "appararently" are differences?

It is clear you don't have a clue when you cast stones toward .NET... You have ZERO first-hand knowledge of how .NET works.

Just to save you the trouble, one of the beefs people with have .NET is that you can't subclass visually - things like buttons, etc. It is a process that has to be done in code. Some people see it as a show-stopper - I for one do not since IMO - deep class hierarchies for visual items is indicative of poor design. Going beyond 1 level is - or at least should be - a rarity. Instead, developers should rely on patterns, aggregation, and composition.