>>>>Finally, most of the people that make this claim - if they would hold their work up to public scrutiny - it would likely not pass muster.
>>>
>>>John, given the proposition that the claim was made by Victor, are you saying that his work "would likely not pass muster"?
>>
>>
>>I would have to see his work first. Note that I said most - not all. And also, when I say likely, it does mean there is a possibility the opposite would be true.
>>
>>Why do you care?
>
>The last time you asked me why I cared (or what was motivating me) I took the liberty of using the term 'misappropriation' (I think it was) in an obviously unusual context, instead of understanding my response I got some pathetic diatribe about my incorrect use of a legalistic term (this was in your ridiculous Windows subsidizes Fox thread). So I'm sure you will understand if I don't bother answering this particular query of yours this time.

Since this is turning ridiculous anyway....
John why do you care why she cares?