Just to be clear, Bill ...

I've never said that overloading was a good, just that the alternatives aren't any better.



>Just to be clear, Craig ...
>
>
>
>overloading of stuff came from C++ ..
>operators, functions, etc -
>came from concept of templates ...
>
>moving forward to C # and other dot net 'initiatives' -
>
>if you ain't matching the concepts of C++ templates in your code base -
>then you [euphemistically] are writing spaghetti code that only *I* can read based on a TME contract. you don't wanna go there, or even deploy that kind o sh|te ..
>
>regards [Bill]
>oh - and big PS - dot net 1.1 ain't there yet for understanding overloading.
>
>one can overload cause the compiler gods overlooked it.