>>In most cases I do. There's one particular case where I have a table that keeps track of running seq #'s. When I add a record to a table, I get the next seq. # from this seq # table. I keep closing it to make sure the data is flushed and I get unique numbers.
>
>Wouldn't the FLUSH command suffice?

I would expect it to, but I think I tried it and then commented out the line. Maybe it was too slow. Maybe I should try it again.