Oops. Thanks for pointing that out, Steve. What can you expect though from a guy from KS/MO who is silly enough to post about something other than VFP here? :)

Reminds me of the few times that I was silly enough to do user group and VFP conference sessions on things that weren't 100% VFP -- a handful (if you have small hands) of folks thanked me and most others couldn't fathom why I was there (let alone why they were, of course). Answering that the UG leader or conference coordinator asked me to speak on the subjects -- at the time, XML, design patterns, VFP in the .NET IDE - yes it was in there briefly during beta :), etc. -- didn't seem to satisfy. Oh well. :)

Kelly

>You're statement would be less offensive if the < gd&r > actually showed on the screen :)
>
>>
>>So, you were smart enough to put those "foggy" clues together, but still you use .Net in places where you could use VFP only?
>>
>>