>
Your original post did not have a high confidence level. You begged it to be disproved, I was merely reversing the responsibility of its proof.
>
You know the old saying right....don't ask a question you don't know the answer to... When necessary, I'll plead ignorance, and ask others to qualify. A good example is George Tasker clarifying that 8 RTM'd in the winter.
>>What I said is a pure statement of fact.
>
>In a negative manner.
But a fact nonetheless...
>>But that is not the point, is it? The issue has to do with what happened in the past. Whether it was an exception or not is 100% irrelevant.
>
>It's no more irrelevant than the points you raise.
>
>>Somebody else is going to have to confirm. Based on my recollection - 7 and 8 RTM's in the fall. I believe VS RTM'd in the fall as well. I believe 5 RTM'd in the fall as well (we wrote a book ). I believe 6 RTM'd in the last summer/fall as well.
>
>Again, not someone else's responsibility to prove your statement true.
But you see the difference right... When 8 RTM'd has zero to do with the issue. Whether it RTM'd in spring, summer, fall, or winter, the validity of my point is unaffected, and as a result - is still valid. That point in case you forgot is that on at least 1 prior occasion, MS HAS COMMENTED on future versions BEYOND WHAT IS CURRENTLY IN BETA.... Nothing more, nothing less...
>>No...I am just saying that when the key note comes - and nothing about 10 is said, that should be indicative of something. Conclusive??? Perhaps not. Just comparing present to history.
>
>We'll see what is said in October.
Yep....and I may even be in Vegas!!
>>Glad you see it my way Dave...
>
>*LOL* Only you could twist this around to mean that I am seeing things your way. Nice try though.
I meant with respect to keeping people honest Dave...;0
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only