>Terry,
>
>>>The vast majority of enhancements to VFP 8 and 9 are customer-driven. Those that have asked those things of us can see that. But, no, we can't respond to every customer with a request as to the status of the request.
>>>
>>
>>There is no rule that says you have to respond. This is America - most customers don't expect a response<g>. I think the issue is that VFP is not on the page - almost like it doesn't exist - just listing the title would be a good start!
>
>A good start on what? Draining the VFP Team's resources? Maybe you didn't read JK's other post about the page and the impact it would have on the team?

So now you're saying there is too much VFP interest to allocate resources to service market queries?

When was the last time any of us called MS for support on a VFP issue - I'll tell you - the three cases we were allocated when we (or our companies) purchased VS 6!

Just how much of a load would you anticipate if there was a page - most of MS's VFP customers are on this board or foxcite - with all the downplay we've been getting lately one would think the link would never get clicked. You can't argue both sides - either there is too much or not enough - in the same breath.

Tell you what - have the link shunt VFP inquiries to someplace we can get to them. 99% wouldbe standard form replies (we'll write a VFP COM to automate those replies - MS can give us the rules to determine what responses are "form letter" replies - and which replies need an actual body to
to service and personalize.

Let MS deputize us - we be the "Fox Cops" for the Fox Team! We volunteer support here - and we pay to be here - why not promote VFP like the ANSI COBOL guys do?