John,

>>>I gave you the broad strokes - with some detail - which should have been enough detail for you to say "sounds interesting, why don't you develop the idea further."
>>
>>You gave me NOTHING -- other than the words VFP/Oracle in the subject line. Go back and look at your 3/11 message.
>>
>
>Wrong again...here is the text:
>
>>>
>I have not heard from you. Are you interested in the content. If you have an issue with me - then just say that. One way or another, just let me know.
>>>

That does not constitute even broad strokes, much less "some detail."

>
>This was a follow-up to a prior email - which you apparently blew off. After the 3/11 email, you finally gave me the basis for your position. I guess your hope was that I would not follow up.

As I told you repeatedly, I never received anything from you about this until the 3/11 email you quoted above. Nothing. I did not blow it off because I did not receive any prior message. Period.

>Whatever Dave...its water over the dam....

That's good news. I'm glad you have decided to put it behind you and move on. I'm sure the community will be appreciative of your posting the articles when you get them done.

>The deal is this Dave...next time....don't cast doubt on other people's logic or motives.... OK??????

And... next time you want to deal with a publishing company, be patient and respect the editor's comments, corrections, rejections, or delays in a professional manner and maybe you will get what you want.