>>I just wish MS would get rid of the [IMO] "licence for use" requirement. I can't figure out what purpose it serves. What the hell is a user going to do with these OCXs? Is it a security thing where MS is afraid some hacker will use them if the license was not there? I would much prefer to just use a custom or other light class to use these instead of a form. Especially for the non-visual controls.
>
>You don't need a form, just a container class in a .VCX. And as far as they license requirement goes, Beats ME!

Yeah, I meant to say I want to avoid using a VCX/SCX at all. PRG class all the way. While I have not totally abandoned SCXs, the more projects I do, the further away from VCXs I get.