Cetin
>Did you take sometime to read the code ? It's kind of code written poorly such giving a feel written on purpose to claim VFP is underperforming :)
>It's always possible to slow down any language with code like this.
>Really funny.
I've had 3 or 4 people question the efficiency of my code, I tried all of their suggestions, guess what? The difference was hardly worth mentioning.
>It's also interesting that my msgs showing Kevin that VFP is much much faster than C# on dealing with data has gone never replied.
I wasn't aware of any messages proving the speed differences in data-access, maybe I've totally forgotten, but I'm sure those messages didn't prove one was faster than the other, prove me wrong as my memory is not brilliant :-)
>PS: I code in C# too but it's simply ridiculous trying to take down VFP with poor test codes. C# is not comparable to VFP but comparison arena is never the data where VFP keeps C# in dust (at least today). Period.
Again, I don't think my test code was poor, it was using rushmore, the SCATTER/INSERT command was hardly performance-hitting, maybe if you could provide me efficient code I'll give it a try and we'll look at the results.
I wasn't intending on turning this into a VFP/.Net battle, I was merely stating that we distributed a real application, in the real world, with real data, and it ran as quickly and efficiently as it's VFP counter-part - why is that so difficult for people to accept?
Kev
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only