>Took you long enough to figure out... lol...
>
>The "head-in-the-sand" crowd will never accept that you can do in .net what you can do in fox, sometimes more efficiently, sometimes less efficiently.

I knew it would blow-up, that always happens, I accept that. It always boils down to the same thing, .Net seems to threaten people merely by the mentioning of it.

Oh well....

Kev

>
>
>>>>>>>>>It's also interesting that my msgs showing Kevin that VFP is much much faster than C# on dealing with data has gone never replied.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I wasn't aware of any messages proving the speed differences in data-access, maybe I've totally forgotten, but I'm sure those messages didn't prove one was faster than the other, prove me wrong as my memory is not brilliant :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>OK Kevin,
>>>>>>>Found it.
>>>>>>>Thread #861648
>>>>>>>Cetin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, I'm aware of that one, but from your message I got the impression that you claimed to have proved my tests wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Kev
>>>>>
>>>>>Hmmm maybe my English is giving that idea. There I showed VFP was way faster than C# if coded correctly (within the context of those small test there).
>>>>
>>>>Oh, did you post your altered VFP code?
>>>>
>>>>Kev
>>>
>>>Not only code many messages with no reply.
>>
>>I refer to my last comment on this, the tests were worthless, hence why I let them die. It seems my latest attempt is going to go the same way due to so many people arguing against results they don't like to see.
>>
>>Kev