>
Did you take sometime to read the code ? It's kind of code written poorly such giving a feel written on purpose to claim VFP is underperforming :)
>It's always possible to slow down any language with code like this.
>Really funny.

Did not look like anything significant to me. It appears to be some sequential processing that would not be a good fit for pure sql. Based on what I saw, there are likely, a lot of variants on how it could be done - but that is not the point.

The basic point is this...like most things - Fox no longer enjoys an absolute advantage in areas where it used to enjoy a presumptive advantage. It all goes to why there are less and less compelling reasons to use Fox.

It is nothing more than an isolated incident to make a point - nothing more and nothing less.