>>>
>>They might have a bunch of fox-code they don't want to convert. Doesn't mean it couldn't be redone in .NET of course, but it might be cheaper for them.
>>>
>>
>>In reality, ther perceived cost savings in these situations is illusory.
>
>Cheaper to re-write 100,000's lines of code than it is to simply reuse it??


But that pre-supposes you can re-use it. I love your logic here. You cannot just assume the logic can be simply re-used. This by the way is the biggest flaw in the thinking that goes on when companies contemplate going from VFP/DBF's to SQL Server...