Walter Meester?

>lol ;) OK, how's this for an answer (just kidding here)...
>
>Sorin, you must provide quantitative facts to support your argument without which you postulate only an assumptive proposition which should be relegated to the scrapheap of obscurity along with whatever language you use to program in. I on the other hand am in the know and it is clear that because I have written several articles and a book many, many years ago that I am in a superior position and can, through my arrogance and legal style talk, put you in your place and talk down at you ... because afterall that is my moral duty on this forum. IAC, it should have been "gasp.Net" ...
>
>Now who does that sound like? :)
>
>
>
>>Your gasp is logically flawed, Jos! Sorry, I couldn't resist...
>>
>>>lol! Careful though ... just now you'll be challenged to a CV comparison ... gasp!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I am always amused reading some of the NEVER-ENDING messages. Especially when those start patting themselves on the back for all they know and have done. Reminds me of the saying:
>>>>
>>>>“The more one pats themselves on the back, the more others see of their arm pits!”