>I realize that the code is outdated, but it was working just fine. I don't like to change code unless necessary (we have too many other updates to worry about, etc.) I always like to understand why code does/doesn't work, not just accept that it does/doesn't for my own edification. Having said that, I will probably move away from FoxTools calls as much as possible...just needed an excuse, I guess.
>
>Thanks George for your response!

You're welcome Tod.

I started moving away from Foxtools for a number of reasons. Principally, because so much of the utility was moved into the language proper.

Having said that, I think that the code should work without modification. The only problem I've encountered is versioning. AFAIK, even the foxtools that ships with the public beta should work fine. I do know, however, that the library isn't officially supported by Microsoft.