Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
What is .Net Equivalent to VFP Containers?
Message
From
13/08/2004 16:34:08
 
General information
Forum:
ASP.NET
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00933235
Message ID:
00933237
Views:
21
Hi Simon,

Welcome to the wonderful world of .NET! <g>

Yes, you can do similar things in .NET and your "container class" would be the UserControl. UserControls *can* be visually designed.

Also, I recommend, just as you did in VFP, that you first sub-class all your UI controls (TextBox, ComboBox, etc.) and use your sub-classed controls on Forms and UserControls. These types of controls cannot be visually designed, but it's not that big a deal ... what do you really need to see to create a button sub-class anyway? These sub-classed controls can all be put in one class library (IOW, one .cs or .vb file, which will be one .DLL).

I hope this helps you get started on the right foot!! =)

~~Bonnie


>Hi
>
>I have finally gotten a chance to begin learning .NET. So I will probably have some basic newbie questions for awhile.
>
>In VFP all my interface classes are based on VFP Containers which are added to forms dynamically at runtime. This allowed for faster startup of the application because the container was not added to the form until it was activated. So if the user chose a menu item that opened several forms only the active form loaded the container with the controls. The other forms were created but no container was added until the form was activated.
>
>In .NET is such a technique required? If such a technique would be useful what class would be the equivalent of the VFP container and can this class be visually designed?
>
>Thanks
>Simon White
Bonnie Berent DeWitt
NET/C# MVP since 2003

http://geek-goddess-bonnie.blogspot.com
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform