No need at all to apologize. On the other hand, 'hurt sentimentalities' sounds quite negative, but maybe it is not for a native speaker.
Your search has led you to an anti-semitic website. I would not refer to any page of such a website, not even if the text on the webpage *might* be correct information. It is an act that gives these people some kind of official status, asif they are equal to professional journalists.
I wonder why the Swedish government allows the website.
>I apologize for any hurt sentimentalities. I was trying to determine whether or not the sanctions against Iran still existed. I do not agree with the information on the site.
>
>
>>Hi Tracey,
>>
>>I'm sure your intentions are allright (as they always have proven to be), but I must say that the site you are advertising here is extremely anti-semitic, at the least.
>>
>>>I agree with what you said, but has the ban on Iranian oil changed?
>>>
>>>
http://www.radioislam.org/forum/english/usataxp.htm>>>
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
