>
>I noticed it too. BTW, and I've copied Michel on this, you need to CATCH to an object. Much better way of handling exceptions (not errors).>Indeed. I use
Catch to oErr
most of the time, but here I was following his example for the sake of clarity.
Ah, I see, and I should've known, Alex.< s >
George
Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est