You're right, I did not read well.

>That might explain my very tongue-in-cheek title to this thread. It was not meant literally.
>
>>One has to be very careful with small samples like this one. Statistically, chances of getting wrong conclusions with small samples is big.
>>
>>
>>>Number of positions listed in Jobs section here at UT:
>>>
>>>February - 1
>>>July - 2
>>>August - 6
>>>
>>>Which would look approximately like this charted:
>>>
>>>

>>>6 .                                            O
>>>5 .
>>>4 .
>>>3 .
>>>2 .                                       O
>>>1 .          O
>>>0 .    O           O    O     O     O
>>>  -----J-----F-----M----A-----M-----J-----J-----A-----S-----O-----N-----D-----
>>>

>>>
>>>If I weren't an educated analyst I might just think that the market was picking up. Or at least Foxpro jobs were.
>>>
>>>Ok, so I had a little extra time on my hands... <s>