>>If I wear my 'super retentive' had, I would argue that the SEEK() function as opposed to the SEEK command (action), [also] requires an extra cycle to package the return (T of F).
>
>Can't see how it would be relevant. But SEEK command does what you want anyway. If you want to save time, use INDEXSEEK() without moving the pointer :)
>

Thanks - I did quite a bit of INDEXSEEKing the last few days!:)


>>Did you know that SEEK command had the table and tag arguments? Even ZAP (now) has an 'IN' clause. Of course - it may have been that way for a while!:)
>>
>
>Yes
I am so behind the times:) I heard the other day that watches were powered by batteries now!