>>I'm obviously missing the point. If both PUTMs and non-PUTMs see the same options/benefits in one area, but some are disabled for the non-PUTMs, wouldn't everyone see everything? Only PUTMs would have access to all the options. Maybe it's harder than I think or I'm not explaining it correctly.
>
>I didn't understand the request at first. Yes, like that it could work. It's just that presently, I would like to see if a better arrangement could be done in that area. We have a lot of options in there and before going too far, I would like to make sure we're doing it right.

Ok. That makes sense.