>Next time please put all your spam in one message, it's a little less annoying that way.
Heya Rob -
ya know ? When I procured the stack o CoDe Mags I thought I'd save folks some money - the demographic matches those who wanted the back issues. So I posted here in a Dot Net Forum on UT with the Annoucement....
Now you've dipped off into the black realm o spam . I have to ask myself - DID I SPAM THE UT for these two mag issues o CoDe ??? [my answer, of course, is a resounding NO - I listed the *TWO* issues in *TWO* - count em - *TWO* seperate posts - with *TWO* seperate URLS.
and my answer, still, to that question o SPAM [imo], is *NO* ...
If I have have offended your sensibilities somehow/what ? I offer you my deepest apologies / bow in the dust kind o thing .
But ? In The Mean Time ?
Care to Buy A Back Issue ? I apparently have some to sell...
I'll understand - really - if YOU are a developer for DOT NET, with a bend for 'it should be free, since it came from my understanding of VFP-related publications' .... alas- that opinion is flawed, IMO.
I - am NOT - a DOT NET developer. I have not sent to any clients ANY NEW Dot Net CodeBase - nor Will I Ever. In The MeanTime - I DO review tons o Dot Net CodeBase that failed for 'the implementation' . I can read da DotNet codebase and translate it back to other stuff. It's a wonderful world - dat billable time , ah ?
warmest regards [once] Bill.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only