>My understanding of table buffering is that is a level of buffering higher than transaction buffering. That is, stuff put in the table buffer during a transaction block will remain intact even if a rollback is issued. The observed behavior seems to be contrary to my knowledge as illustrated by the following code:

We have similar understanding Taylor. In fact, we do no longer used Transaction/Rollback syntax because it works useless if using Buffering, TableUpdate, TableRevert etc., etc. or maybe we have the wrong approach. As I understand, Transaction/Rollback are FP original syntax and not on VFP.

>Please respond with work arounds, and affirmations that yes, this is a bug, or no this is working as expected.
>TIA,
>Peter