Hilmar,
I don't think it'd change as it's the case in all VFP versions since 3.0 and behavior is similar to Fox2x's @ ... say get ordering (I was using it in Fox2x to change things n the fly and still same in VFP8-9 I think should be same).
PS: I hate those kind of changes and prefer to stay as undocumented only - not documented really?:)
Cetin

>I was surprised, too, when I first learned about it. I have seen it used in a framework - a version of CodeBook, I think it was.
>
>Now, being apparently undocumented behaviour means that, in theory, this behaviour is not guaranteed to continue working in future versions.
>
>>Cetin,
>>
>>I can not belive it. (No, No it's true, I can trace it on my comp)
>>So it means the backmost object is instantiated first and all following are drawn over it. What a solution!
>>
>>I guess I have learned enough for this day.
>>
>>Agnes