The arguments on this page are flawed in many respects.

It is amazing to me that JFast is STILL pointed to as the poster child for Fox. Two things. First, the app is at least 7 years old. Second, Jfast is being re-written in .NET - and new elements of the application are being written in .NET. If that application were being contemplated today, could you honestly say it would be written in VFP???? Clearly, the answer is no...

What Fox has today is by virture of what happened years ago - not because of new innovation today or a desire to begin using the product.

I believe people should fight the good fight. I also believe that if you are going to do it, you need to find some compelling arguments.

John



>Hi Gerard,
>
>Please check http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~VfpIsUnderAttack~VFP
>
>Hope it helps,
>
>Fernando
>
>>Hi.
>>I remember seeing somewhere recently that Microsoft and/or Ken Levy have committed to supporting VFP until a particluar date.
>>
>>Does anybody know where I can get a copy of this statement, ideally signed by Ken Levy (or Bill Gates will do )
>>
>>
>>Also, anybosy know of a site where I can get Case Studies of projects running on VFP.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Gerard