What do you mean he's gone? Has he been booted off the UT again? I didn't see anything this time that was against the UT guidelines.


>John's gone from UT. Don't bother responding to his messages now.
>
>>I did not answer because it will not help us get anywhere. Regardless of what I share with you, you will continue to believe you have a better understanding of the project and the client.
>>
>>I told you they are not dependant on me so yes they have the source code. And no my UI and Biz rules are not so closely tied that they could not be seperated easily, although a web based version would have little value to them.
>>
>>You have one opinion and I have another, you just like to present your opinion as if it were a fact. You are not going to find a valid reason why this project should have gone .Net/Java, so don't bother.
>>
>>You speak with the same arrogance and conviction for things couldn't know anything about as the things you may no somethings about, so I have a hard time accepting anything you say.
>>
>>
>>>>John,
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>>In theory - yes. The one guy up here who touted the 50K Fox solution vs. the 500K .NET solution - I asked him if he gave the client the source code. He never answered.
>>>
>>>Your right, the quality of the developer is a major issue.
>>>
>>>Given the context Dave, you answered your own question. i.e., you got my point.
>>>
>>>John