Which doesn't make them any less vague or subject to interpretation.

>"Inappropriate behaviour online" was always there, "Internet trolling" is new, and the definition we used was taken from:
>http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm#WIAT
>
>
>>Thanks Nick ... I'm not sure which of these are new, but some of these rules seem a bit vague and subject to interpretation ... and depending on who does the interpreting I can see there could be widely different opinions. I mean, you gets to define what "Inappropriate behaviour online" and "Internet trolling" is, just to name two.
>>
>>Oh well, I guess there's not much *I* can do about it, so why bother complaining. =(
>>
>>~~Bonnie
>>
>>
>>>Hi Bonnie,
>>>
>>>There are changes at http://www.levelextreme.com/Term.asp
>>>
>>>>What are these new rules? I've looked and can't find anything about it.
>>>>
>>>>~~Bonnie
>>>>
>>>>>Michel, I believe that this post violates the new rules. Better be careful now Denis...
>>>>>
>>>>>>It seem that JVP is polluting the VFP forum. He'll respond on any thread saying whatever he thinks will give him a reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So what could happen out of this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The greatest VFP support site will get more and more pollution. And this could lead to too much distraction and developers leaving the UT hoping to find another place where there is no childish behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So how about not replying to John's posts anymore in the VFP forum. It's not like we don't know what he thinks about VFP. He's made that crystal clear in the last months.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And perhaps one day he'll start again being helpful to others on how to use .Net - in the .Net forum - instead of just trying to be waste our time.